›› 2012, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 23-30.doi: 10.3780/j.issn.1000-758X.2012.06.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

ComparisononEKFandUKFforGeomagneticAttitudeEstimationofLEOSatellites

 YANG  Bin1, XU  Guang-Han1,2, JIN  Jin3, ZHOU  You1   

  1. (1SchoolofElectronicandInformationEngineering,BeihangUniversity,Beijing100191)
    (2BeijingXinweiTelecomTechnologyInc.,Beijing100094)
    (3SchoolofAerospace,TsinghuaUniversity,Beijing100084)
  • Received:2012-02-23 Revised:2012-04-19 Published:2012-12-25 Online:2012-12-25

Abstract: AlowEarthorbit(LEO)satellitecanbestabilized    in3-axisbycorporatelyusingamagnetometer,reactionwheelsand3-axismagnetorquerrods.Itischallengingtodeterminate anappropriateattitudeforLEO.Toaddressthischallenge,thealgorithmsofextendedKalmanfilter(EKF)andunscentedKalmanfilter(UKF)werecomparedandasolutionwasproposedbyexploringtheinfluenceofthegeomagneticmodelerror,themagneticmeasurementerrorandtheremanenceontheperformanceofattitudedetermination.Inaddition,thecalculationofmeanandcovariancequaternionwasderived.TheEKFandUKFwereintroducedtoattitudedetermination,andthefactorswhichhaveinfluenceonthealgorithmperformancewerediscussed.Twoalgorithmswerecomparedonestimationaccuracy,convergencetimeandcomputationcomplexity.Withtheaccuracyrequirementsandthehardwarelimitations,theEKFalgorithmwasfinallychosenfortheattitudedetermination.Simulationresultsshowthattheearthpointingaccuracyoftheproposedsolutioncanreach1°withthestabilityof0.1(°)/s.

Key words: Kalmanfilter, UnscentedKalmanfilter, Geomagneticmeasurement, Attitudedetermination, LowEarthorbitsatellite